Friday, March 30, 2007

Taking \Vancouver on the road & getting out of jail free!

It's been a busy couple of weeks but I've got 2 shows in April for those of you in a travelling mood!


\Vancouver

Langham Cultural Centre
Kaslo, BC
April 6 - May 5

Building on last year’s Britannia Gallery show, this solo exhibition features new cityscapes and lightboxes that continue to explore themes of ordinary beauty and how it relates to history and memory within our communities.

I will be on hand for the opening reception on Friday, April 6 from 7-9 pm, so if you're in the Kootenays with no plans for Easter weekend, you know where to be.

All new work is available for viewing online in my cityscapes section.


And for those of you craving California...
Get Out of Jail Free
Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence Gallery
San Francisco
April 1 - 30

Last Meal: Stanley ‘Tookie’ Williams, the fourth painting in my continuing series on capital punishment will be shown as part of the Get Out of Jail Free exhibition in San Francisco. It will be on display April 1- 30 at the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence Gallery with an Artists Reception on April 12.

From my artist statement -

The execution of Crips co-founder Stanley Tookie Williams in 2005 raised international debate in regards to the question of redemption vs guilt. A notorious gangbanger who later went on to write children’s book warning about the dangers of gang life, Williams was denied clemency by Governor Schwarzenegger for his refusal to admit guilt in the murders of which he was convicted. Williams refused the privilege of a last meal and instead had a bowl of oatmeal and milk.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Students Tour Death Penalty Art Show at Alternative Spring Break

Students on Anti Death Penalty Spring Break toured the Death Penalty Art Show at the Texas State Capitol this past week and videotaped the artworks on display (including Last Meal: Ruben Cantu) as well as met with State Representative Borris Miles. Rep. Miles was the official responsible for the recent art show controversy when he illegally removed two artworks he deemed to be offensive.

- Kate MacDonald

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Letters to the Editor About Death Penalty Art Show Controversy

Click here for a comprehensive list of articles about the Death Penalty Art Show Controversy at the Texas State Capitol.

The Austin Chronicle has another letter-to-the-editor in this week's edition about the art exhibition I participated in at the Texas State Capitol in which State Representative Borris Miles illegally and inappropriately removed two works he considered offensive.

IF STATE REPS CAN STEAL, WHY CAN'T THE REST OF US?

Dear Editor,

As an artist, musician, and writer, I was horrified by state Rep. Borris Miles’ action in stealing artwork from an anti-death-penalty exhibition at the Capitol and the legal and public apathy in its wake [“State Representative: Let’s Hang the Artist,” News, March 30]. I brightened, however, when it hit me that, if all I have to do is adopt a stance of righteous indignation, change some language, and abuse my position as an elected official (two out of three ain’t bad), then I, too, can not only publicly confess to stealing but get away with it with nary a raised eyebrow! Thanks to Mr. Miles and the trend he has set, I can now realize my lifelong dream of marching into the nearest Hallmark store and confiscating every glittery, heavy-lidded, huge-craniumed Precious Moments figurine on the shelves, stating that they offend my sensibility as an artist on one hand and as a human with a brain and a modicum of good taste on the other. I shall stash them in my studio and, when confronted, stand tall and proud, declaring that because I have decided for the rest of you that they are tacky and inappropriate, I stripped them from public view on my own initiative. Many of my friends who regularly compliment the emperor’s new clothes would agree with me. Once I start to feel the heat, I’ll simply say I gave the Precious Moments figurines back to a Hallmark employee, who will deny having them, and no one will “seem to know where [they] have gone” at press time.The sad truth is that there never would have been an issue if Mr. Miles had taken five minutes to go to the information desk and inquire about the nature of the exhibition.And I’d be arrested and jailed if I took Precious Moments figurines, because people care about Precious Moments and collect them, whereas what Mr. Miles took was just a couple of anti-death-penalty paintings that don’t matter, made by some chick from Portland, Ore., and some black guy on death row. Right, Mr. Miles?

Yours in fear for what’s left of our First Amendment rights,
Jennie Kay Snyder

- Kate MacDonald

Friday, March 16, 2007

Controversy at Death Penalty Art Show

Houston Representative Borris Miles with Vancouver artist Kate MacDonald's painting Last Meal: Ruben Cantu at the Texas State Capitol Building (Photo: N. Simonite for American-Statesman)LAWMAKER TAKES OFFENSE TO CAPITOL ART DISPLAY
Execution Images Removed by Houston Legislator

By W. Gardner Selby
AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
Tuesday, March 13, 2007

State Rep. Borris Miles removed two pieces of art from public view in the Texas Capitol Extension on Monday, calling them appallingly objectionable, especially with children milling about.
Miles, D-Houston, removed a color painting showing a black man hanging from a rope. In the background, another black man stands behind bars. Miles also removed a black-and-white illustration showing a man tied to an electric chair with the inscription "Doing God's Work."

The Capitol "is no place for this display," said Miles, who is African American. He said the pieces will stay in his office until someone claims them.

The works were part of an exhibit put up by the Texas Moratorium Network, which is seeking a two-year moratorium on executions.

Scott Cobb of Austin, president of the group, said he intends to speak with Miles.

"The purpose of the show is to spark civic engagement around the issues of the death penalty, particularly the risk of executing an innocent person," Cobb said.

In an e-mail to colleagues, Miles wrote, "I was greeted with these images as I walked through the halls of the extension this morning with my two children, ages five and eight. I consider them to be extremely inappropriate and highly objectionable. Capitol exhibits are supposed to serve a public purpose or be informational in nature. These pictures were hung with no accompanying text or explanation.

"I have spoken with staff at the State Preservation Board regarding the process for selecting exhibits and the oversight responsibility for items selected for display. I am sending these for your review and comment on the pictures and the process by which items for public display in the Capitol and Extension buildings are selected and approved."

Miles later called the displayed works "an innocent mistake." He added that procedures are needed for what goes on display.

Julie Fields, spokeswoman for the preservation board, said the agency does not edit exhibits properly sponsored by legislators — in this case, Rep. Harold Dutton Jr., D-Houston. Dutton did not immediately return a call for comment.

Friday, March 9, 2007

Last Meal: Ruben Cantu at Texas State Capitol

Oil painting Last Meal: Ruben Cantu from the Last Meals series of paintings protesting the death penalty by artist Kate MacDonald. 24x20 - oil on canvas.
I'm proud to report that following the success of the Justice For All? show at Gallery M Squared in Houston, Texas, Last Meal: Ruben Cantu was one of only eleven pieces chosen for exhibit at the Texas State Capitol building in Austin.

From my artist statement on this piece-

Ruben Cantu was seventeen years old at the time of the offence for which he was wrongly convicted. After sentencing, he wrote to the people of San Antonio:“My name is Ruben M. Cantu and I am only 18 years old. I got to the 9th grade and I have been framed in a capital murder case."

His last meal consisted of barbecue chicken, brown rice, refried beans and sweet tea. His request for bubble gum was denied.

Cantu's innocence is now widely accepted; it is believed that a close family member who returned to Mexico was the actual perpetrator of the crime.